Belinda Bencic vs Paula Badosa — Charleston Quarter-final

Charleston · WTA · Quarter-final
Belinda Bencic
SUI10
Belinda Bencic
#11WTA
1989ELO
1849Clay ELO
$1.8MYTD
$17MCAREER
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Paula Badosa
ESP2
Paula Badosa
#141WTA
1780ELO
1684Clay ELO
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLWWL
Bencic B.
2-6 7-6 6-4
Badosa P.
Bencic B.
27762
Badosa P.
66241

Belinda Bencic defeated Paula Badosa 2-6 7-6 6-4 in the Charleston quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Belinda Bencic came in ranked #11. Belinda Bencic claimed a first win over Paula Badosa in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-10SydneyQFhardPaula Badosa7-6(6) 3-6 6-3
2021-04-29MadridQFclayPaula Badosa6-4 7-5
2021-04-05Charleston 1R32clayPaula Badosa6-2 6-7(2) 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Bencic B.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Badosa P.

Badosa P.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bencic B.

Serve advantage — Bencic B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Bencic B.Badosa P.
38
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bencic B.Badosa P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.8
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (173 vs 183). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bencic B.Badosa P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
88
93
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Even
94
94
Deciding sets·Even
98
95
Tiebreaks·Even
98
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bencic B.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Badosa P.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.8+164 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Clay Elo 1684
7.8Overall Elo 1989
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1780
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.0
Surface form
8.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
5.6
Country comfort
6.4
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bencic B.Badosa P.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
58

Bencic B.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 29 games (7d) · Badosa P.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 98 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°CPartly cloudy
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 53%

Draw

Final
Bencic B.[10]
Jabeur O.[4]
6-15-76-4
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[4]
Anisimova A.[15]
2-66-16-4
Bencic B.[10]
Alexandrova E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Anisimova A.[15]
Vandeweghe C.
6-16-2
Jabeur O.[4]
Kalinina A.
6-36-2
Alexandrova E.
Linette M.
6-06-2
Bencic B.[10]
Badosa P.[2]
2-67-626-4
R16
Anisimova A.[15]
Sabalenka A.[1]
3-66-46-3
Jabeur O.[4]
Begu I.
6-36-2
Linette M.
Kanepi K.
6-34-66-2
Alexandrova E.
Pliskova K.[3]
6-36-1
Vandeweghe C.
Pegula J.[6]
6-43-66-4
Bencic B.[10]
Keys M.[9]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Cornet A.[12]
7-657-5
Badosa P.[2]
Liu C.
3-67-686-1
R32
Pliskova K.[3]
Zavatska K.
5-77-56-4
Liu C.
Zhang S.[16]
7-52-66-4
Sabalenka A.[1]
Riske Amritraj A.
7-636-4
Anisimova A.[15]
Putintseva Y.
6-16-2
Vandeweghe C.
Davis L.
3-66-36-3
Pegula J.[6]
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Jabeur O.[4]
Navarro E.
6-36-2
Begu I.
Tomljanovic A.[14]
6-26-3
Cornet A.[12]
Baptiste H.
6-36-2
Kalinina A.
Rybakina E.[5]
6-42-66-4
Linette M.
Fernandez L.[7]
3-66-36-4
Bencic B.[10]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-17-66
Badosa P.[2]
Bondar A.
6-16-4
Alexandrova E.
Zheng Q.
2-67-55-2
Kanepi K.
Frech M.
7-56-3
Keys M.[9]
Eikeri U.
6-36-1
R64
Riske Amritraj A.
Mcnally C.
7-56-3
Putintseva Y.
Anderson R.
6-27-69
Paolini J.
Lee G.
6-26-3
Cornet A.[12]
Parks A.
6-07-5
Navarro E.
Brengle M.
6-746-23-0
Kalinina A.
Sasnovich A.
6-46-4
Zheng Q.
Stephens S.[13]
6-34-66-0
Alexandrova E.
Kiick A.
6-16-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Konjuh A.
4-66-16-3
Frech M.
Kvitova P.[11]
7-663-2
Zhang S.[16]
Di Lorenzo F.
6-26-4
Vandeweghe C.
Gasanova A.
6-34-66-3
Anisimova A.[15]
Vickery S.
6-07-5
Linette M.
Volynets K.
4-66-37-64
Tomljanovic A.[14]
Chang S.
7-56-4
Bencic B.[10]
Wang X.
4-67-656-3
Zavatska K.
Yuan Y.
6-46-2
Begu I.
Wang X.
7-626-4
Kanepi K.
Rogers S.
6-727-56-2
Liu C.
Watson H.
6-46-2
Davis L.
Bolkvadze M.
6-26-3
Bondar A.
Hartono A.
6-16-4
Eikeri U.
Kichenok N.
5-76-26-2
Baptiste H.
Ruse E.
6-36-0