Holger Rune vs Andrea Arnaboldi — Sanremo CH Semi-final

Sanremo CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Holger Rune
DEN1
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1729Clay ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
ITA
Andrea Arnaboldi
38 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWWW
Rune H.
6-4 6-1
Arnaboldi A.
Rune H.
662
Arnaboldi A.
410

Holger Rune defeated Andrea Arnaboldi 6-4 6-1 in the Sanremo CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Arnaboldi A.

Arnaboldi A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve advantage — Rune H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Arnaboldi A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Arnaboldi A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
77
Break points won·Dominant
84
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Arnaboldi A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[1]
Passaro F.
6-12-66-4
Semi-finals
Passaro F.
Mager G.[2]
6-16-1
Rune H.[1]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Mager G.[2]
Fabbiano T.[7]
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Vatutin A.
6-23-67-67
Rune H.[1]
Gigante M.
6-36-0
Passaro F.
Valkusz M.
4-66-36-2
R16
Gigante M.
Martineau M.
6-37-5
Mager G.[2]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-53-67-5
Valkusz M.
Albot R.[3]
6-31-66-2
Passaro F.
Muller A.[8]
6-16-2
Vatutin A.
Zekic M.
5-76-26-4
Rune H.[1]
Fatic N.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-3
R32
Zekic M.
Herbert P.[4]
4-66-36-3
Mager G.[2]
Forti F.
6-26-4
Karlovskiy E.
Vacherot V.
6-16-757-62
Albot R.[3]
Sultanov K.
6-23-66-1
Passaro F.
Gojo B.
6-46-2
Muller A.[8]
Miedler L.
6-36-4
Arnaboldi A.
Grenier H.[5]
6-36-2
Gigante M.
Cobolli F.[6]
2-66-46-3
Fatic N.
Zeppieri G.
6-46-2
Rune H.[1]
Tiurnev E.
6-37-612
Valkusz M.
Donati M.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Arnaldi M.
7-57-5
Vatutin A.
Haase R.
7-52-66-2
Sachko V.
Lavagno E.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sels J.
7-51-66-2
Martineau M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-0