Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Kacper Zuk — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
Stebe C.
6-3 6-3
Zuk K.
Stebe C.
662
Zuk K.
330

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Kacper Zuk 6-3 6-3 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Cedrik Marcel Stebe came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Cedrik Marcel Stebe extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-23Roland GarrosQ1clayCedrik Marcel Stebe3-6 6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Zuk K.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Zuk K.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Zuk K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
18
Break points saved·Even
75
76
Break points won·Even
10
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stebe C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zuk K.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
5.9
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.
Riedi L.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Nardi L.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Riedi L.
Herbert P.[4]
3-67-637-63
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.
Kym J.
4-66-37-67
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.
6-16-1
Herbert P.[4]
Copil M.
2-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Huesler M.
6-27-64
R16
Kym J.
Kotov P.
3-66-26-1
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Sugita Y.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Virtanen O.
6-16-4
Herbert P.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-5
Huesler M.
Dzumhur D.[5]
6-36-2
Riedi L.
Added D.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Basic M.
4-66-46-3
R32
Setkic A.
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Nardi L.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-4
Basic M.
Moraing M.[3]
7-646-3
Sugita Y.
Chung Y.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.
Stricker D.[8]
6-37-5
Copil M.
Novak D.[6]
6-42-66-3
Virtanen O.
Feldbausch K.
6-16-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Brouwer G.
7-646-747-5
Herbert P.[4]
Horansky F.
7-626-4
Dzumhur D.[5]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-2
Huesler M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Added D.
Masur D.
6-47-5
Riedi L.
Cressy M.[1]
7-626-736-4
Stebe C.
Zuk K.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Muller A.
6-37-62
Kotov P.
Albot R.[2]
6-26-3