Mats Rosenkranz vs Go Soeda — Saint-Brieuc CH Round of 32

Saint-Brieuc CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#358ATP
1454ELO
1424Hard ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
JPN
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Rosenkranz M.
6-2 7-6
Soeda G.
Rosenkranz M.
6772
Soeda G.
2640

Mats Rosenkranz defeated Go Soeda 6-2 7-6 in the Saint-Brieuc CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosenkranz M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Serve advantage — Rosenkranz M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosenkranz M.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
76%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (155 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosenkranz M.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
31
23
Break points saved·Dominant
86
61
Break points won·Clear edge
1
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
46
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
6
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosenkranz M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Soeda G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.8
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[5]
Bergs Z.
6-25-76-4
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.
Halys Q.[2]
3-66-36-1
Draper J.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-20-66-0
Quarter-finals
Bergs Z.
Hassan B.
W/O
Halys Q.[2]
Gray A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
6-21-66-1
Draper J.[5]
Furness E.
6-26-1
R16
Draper J.[5]
Haase R.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Safiullin R.[4]
W/O
Halys Q.[2]
Squire H.
6-47-62
Gray A.
Gojo B.
6-17-66
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
7-53-66-4
Peniston R.
Hoang A.[8]
6-16-766-3
Escoffier A.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-1
Furness E.
Karlovskiy E.
6-47-5
R32
Halys Q.[2]
Lamasine T.
6-26-2
Gray A.
Mayot H.
6-34-66-4
Draper J.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-37-63
Karlovskiy E.
Simon G.[3]
6-757-657-5
Hoang A.[8]
Van Assche L.
6-756-26-4
Peniston R.
Marozsan F.
6-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Soeda G.
6-27-64
Gojo B.
Barrere G.[6]
6-46-2
Haase R.
Fils A.
7-57-5
Furness E.
Sels J.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Pervolarakis M.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Torpegaard M.
4-67-696-3
Moriya H.
Jaziri M.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.[4]
Galarneau A.
7-657-62
Hassan B.
Lestienne C.[7]
3-2
Escoffier A.
Janvier M.
7-627-64