Jerome Kym vs Alexandre Muller — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Jerome Kym
#186ATP
1599ELO
1591Hard ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
Alexandre Muller
FRA
Alexandre Muller
#132ATP
1665ELO
1630Hard ELO
$426kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Kym J.
6-3 7-6
Muller A.
Kym J.
6772
Muller A.
3620

Jerome Kym defeated Alexandre Muller 6-3 7-6 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexandre Muller came in ranked #132.

Key context

  • Match story: Jerome Kym closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Muller A.

Muller A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Serve advantage — Kym J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kym J.Muller A.
—
Serve
11
—
Return
13

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Muller A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Muller A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
75
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Clear edge
21
44
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
95
Tiebreaks·Even
80
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Muller A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1591
Surface ELO
5.5+39 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1665
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Muller A.
Freshness·Dominant
64
98

Kym J.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 94 games (7d) · Muller A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.
Riedi L.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Nardi L.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Riedi L.
Herbert P.[4]
3-67-637-63
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.
Kym J.
4-66-37-67
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.
6-16-1
Herbert P.[4]
Copil M.
2-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Huesler M.
6-27-64
R16
Kym J.
Kotov P.
3-66-26-1
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Sugita Y.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Virtanen O.
6-16-4
Herbert P.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-5
Huesler M.
Dzumhur D.[5]
6-36-2
Riedi L.
Added D.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Basic M.
4-66-46-3
R32
Setkic A.
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Nardi L.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-4
Basic M.
Moraing M.[3]
7-646-3
Sugita Y.
Chung Y.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.
Stricker D.[8]
6-37-5
Copil M.
Novak D.[6]
6-42-66-3
Virtanen O.
Feldbausch K.
6-16-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Brouwer G.
7-646-747-5
Herbert P.[4]
Horansky F.
7-626-4
Dzumhur D.[5]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-2
Huesler M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Added D.
Masur D.
6-47-5
Riedi L.
Cressy M.[1]
7-626-736-4
Stebe C.
Zuk K.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Muller A.
6-37-62
Kotov P.
Albot R.[2]
6-26-3