Otto Virtanen vs Kilian Feldbausch — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Otto Virtanen
FIN
Otto Virtanen
#126ATP
1706ELO
1674Hard ELO
$214kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
SUI
Kilian Feldbausch
#262ATP
1618ELO
1402Hard ELO
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Virtanen O.
6-1 6-2
Feldbausch K.
Virtanen O.
662
Feldbausch K.
120

Otto Virtanen defeated Kilian Feldbausch 6-1 6-2 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Otto Virtanen came in ranked #126.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Virtanen O.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Feldbausch K.

Feldbausch K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Virtanen O.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Virtanen O.Feldbausch K.
1st serve in·Clear edge
59%
71%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
74%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.7
1.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Virtanen O.Feldbausch K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
42
Break points saved·Dominant
94
27
Break points won·Dominant
3
64
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
72
Tiebreaks·
85
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Virtanen O.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Feldbausch K.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
9.2+273 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.8Hard Elo 1402
7.6Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1618
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
8.3
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Virtanen O.Feldbausch K.
Freshness·Slight edge
80
73

Virtanen O.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d) · Feldbausch K.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.
Riedi L.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Nardi L.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Riedi L.
Herbert P.[4]
3-67-637-63
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.
Kym J.
4-66-37-67
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.
6-16-1
Herbert P.[4]
Copil M.
2-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Huesler M.
6-27-64
R16
Kym J.
Kotov P.
3-66-26-1
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Sugita Y.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Virtanen O.
6-16-4
Herbert P.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-5
Huesler M.
Dzumhur D.[5]
6-36-2
Riedi L.
Added D.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Basic M.
4-66-46-3
R32
Setkic A.
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Nardi L.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-4
Basic M.
Moraing M.[3]
7-646-3
Sugita Y.
Chung Y.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.
Stricker D.[8]
6-37-5
Copil M.
Novak D.[6]
6-42-66-3
Virtanen O.
Feldbausch K.
6-16-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Brouwer G.
7-646-747-5
Herbert P.[4]
Horansky F.
7-626-4
Dzumhur D.[5]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-2
Huesler M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Added D.
Masur D.
6-47-5
Riedi L.
Cressy M.[1]
7-626-736-4
Stebe C.
Zuk K.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Muller A.
6-37-62
Kotov P.
Albot R.[2]
6-26-3