Antoine Escoffier vs Mats Rosenkranz — Saint-Brieuc CH Round of 16

Saint-Brieuc CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#358ATP
1454ELO
1424Hard ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
Escoffier A.
7-5 6-1
Rosenkranz M.
Escoffier A.
762
Rosenkranz M.
510

Antoine Escoffier defeated Mats Rosenkranz 7-5 6-1 in the Saint-Brieuc CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Antoine Escoffier came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Rosenkranz M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Rosenkranz M.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.1
8.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 155). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Rosenkranz M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
31
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
86
Break points won·Clear edge
18
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
64
Tiebreaks·Even
3
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Rosenkranz M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.9Hard Elo 1413
Surface ELO
5.1+11 Hard Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1436
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1454
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
4.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[5]
Bergs Z.
6-25-76-4
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.
Halys Q.[2]
3-66-36-1
Draper J.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-20-66-0
Quarter-finals
Bergs Z.
Hassan B.
W/O
Halys Q.[2]
Gray A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
6-21-66-1
Draper J.[5]
Furness E.
6-26-1
R16
Draper J.[5]
Haase R.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Safiullin R.[4]
W/O
Halys Q.[2]
Squire H.
6-47-62
Gray A.
Gojo B.
6-17-66
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
7-53-66-4
Peniston R.
Hoang A.[8]
6-16-766-3
Escoffier A.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-1
Furness E.
Karlovskiy E.
6-47-5
R32
Halys Q.[2]
Lamasine T.
6-26-2
Gray A.
Mayot H.
6-34-66-4
Draper J.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-37-63
Karlovskiy E.
Simon G.[3]
6-757-657-5
Hoang A.[8]
Van Assche L.
6-756-26-4
Peniston R.
Marozsan F.
6-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Soeda G.
6-27-64
Gojo B.
Barrere G.[6]
6-46-2
Haase R.
Fils A.
7-57-5
Furness E.
Sels J.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Pervolarakis M.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Torpegaard M.
4-67-696-3
Moriya H.
Jaziri M.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.[4]
Galarneau A.
7-657-62
Hassan B.
Lestienne C.[7]
3-2
Escoffier A.
Janvier M.
7-627-64