Jack Draper vs Antoine Escoffier — Saint-Brieuc CH Semi-final

Saint-Brieuc CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Jack Draper
GBR5
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Draper J.
6-2 0-6 6-0
Escoffier A.
Draper J.
6062
Escoffier A.
2601

Jack Draper defeated Antoine Escoffier 6-2 0-6 6-0 in the Saint-Brieuc CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve advantage — Draper J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.1
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
10
Break points saved·Dominant
99
68
Break points won·Dominant
83
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
8.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Escoffier A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+369 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1413
10.0Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1436
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
7.2
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Escoffier A.
Freshness·
100
—

Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[5]
Bergs Z.
6-25-76-4
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.
Halys Q.[2]
3-66-36-1
Draper J.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-20-66-0
Quarter-finals
Bergs Z.
Hassan B.
W/O
Halys Q.[2]
Gray A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
6-21-66-1
Draper J.[5]
Furness E.
6-26-1
R16
Draper J.[5]
Haase R.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Safiullin R.[4]
W/O
Halys Q.[2]
Squire H.
6-47-62
Gray A.
Gojo B.
6-17-66
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
7-53-66-4
Peniston R.
Hoang A.[8]
6-16-766-3
Escoffier A.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-1
Furness E.
Karlovskiy E.
6-47-5
R32
Halys Q.[2]
Lamasine T.
6-26-2
Gray A.
Mayot H.
6-34-66-4
Draper J.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-37-63
Karlovskiy E.
Simon G.[3]
6-757-657-5
Hoang A.[8]
Van Assche L.
6-756-26-4
Peniston R.
Marozsan F.
6-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Soeda G.
6-27-64
Gojo B.
Barrere G.[6]
6-46-2
Haase R.
Fils A.
7-57-5
Furness E.
Sels J.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Pervolarakis M.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Torpegaard M.
4-67-696-3
Moriya H.
Jaziri M.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.[4]
Galarneau A.
7-657-62
Hassan B.
Lestienne C.[7]
3-2
Escoffier A.
Janvier M.
7-627-64