Manuel Guinard vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Marbella CH Round of 32

Marbella CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Manuel Guinard
#1565ATP
30 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
clay
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Guinard M.
6-2 7-6
Barranco Cosano J.
Guinard M.
6772
Barranco Cosano J.
2630

Manuel Guinard defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 6-2 7-6 in the Marbella CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Javier Barranco Cosano came in ranked #433, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Guinard M.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Guinard M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Guinard M.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (196 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Guinard M.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Even
13
14
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
70
Break points won·Clear edge
19
33
Deciding sets·Even
7
5
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
2
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Guinard M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Barranco Cosano J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
1.6
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[6]
Cachin P.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Munar J.[6]
Vesely J.[4]
6-36-4
Cachin P.
Andujar P.[3]
5-76-16-3
Quarter-finals
Vesely J.[4]
Carballes Baena R.[5]
6-26-4
Andujar P.[3]
Tseng C.
6-26-4
Cachin P.
Kohlschreiber P.
7-656-2
Munar J.[6]
Molcan A.[2]
7-646-2
R16
Vesely J.[4]
Gombos N.
6-47-65
Tseng C.
Ymer E.
6-47-5
Andujar P.[3]
Hanfmann Y.
6-46-0
Kohlschreiber P.
Taberner C.[8]
4-66-36-4
Cachin P.
Guinard M.
6-46-0
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Gaio F.
6-47-64
Molcan A.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-34-67-64
Munar J.[6]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Brancaccio R.
6-36-4
Alvarez Varona N.
Klein L.
7-656-4
Vesely J.[4]
Kuznetsov A.
6-727-636-1
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Milojevic N.
6-37-61
Tseng C.
Cecchinato M.[7]
6-26-756-3
Taberner C.[8]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-47-5
Kohlschreiber P.
Lehecka J.
2-66-26-1
Guinard M.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-27-63
Cachin P.
Thiem D.[1]
6-36-4
Munar J.[6]
Shevchenko A.
6-26-2
Molcan A.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-37-63
Andujar P.[3]
Pellegrino A.
6-14-66-2
Gombos N.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Ymer E.
Wawrinka S.
6-26-4
Hanfmann Y.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-0
Gaio F.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-11-0