Jack Draper vs Zizou Bergs — Saint-Brieuc CH Final

Saint-Brieuc CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Jack Draper
GBR5
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Draper J.
6-2 5-7 6-4
Bergs Z.
Draper J.
6562
Bergs Z.
2741

Jack Draper defeated Zizou Bergs 6-2 5-7 6-4 in the Saint-Brieuc CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jack Draper extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Jack Draper closed it out in three sets, 6–2 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-06-27WimbledonR128grassJack Draper6-4 6-4 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Draper J.Bergs Z.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.0
6.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
88
69
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Dominant
83
21
Deciding sets·Even
96
92
Tiebreaks·Even
95
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Bergs Z.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+26 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1757
6.3Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1808
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
6.1
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Bergs Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
79

Draper J.: 17 days rest · Bergs Z.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[5]
Bergs Z.
6-25-76-4
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.
Halys Q.[2]
3-66-36-1
Draper J.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-20-66-0
Quarter-finals
Bergs Z.
Hassan B.
W/O
Halys Q.[2]
Gray A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
6-21-66-1
Draper J.[5]
Furness E.
6-26-1
R16
Draper J.[5]
Haase R.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Safiullin R.[4]
W/O
Halys Q.[2]
Squire H.
6-47-62
Gray A.
Gojo B.
6-17-66
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
7-53-66-4
Peniston R.
Hoang A.[8]
6-16-766-3
Escoffier A.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-1
Furness E.
Karlovskiy E.
6-47-5
R32
Halys Q.[2]
Lamasine T.
6-26-2
Gray A.
Mayot H.
6-34-66-4
Draper J.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-37-63
Karlovskiy E.
Simon G.[3]
6-757-657-5
Hoang A.[8]
Van Assche L.
6-756-26-4
Peniston R.
Marozsan F.
6-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Soeda G.
6-27-64
Gojo B.
Barrere G.[6]
6-46-2
Haase R.
Fils A.
7-57-5
Furness E.
Sels J.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Pervolarakis M.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Torpegaard M.
4-67-696-3
Moriya H.
Jaziri M.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.[4]
Galarneau A.
7-657-62
Hassan B.
Lestienne C.[7]
3-2
Escoffier A.
Janvier M.
7-627-64