Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Mirza Basic — Lugano CH Round of 16

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Stebe C.
4-6 6-4 6-3
Basic M.
Stebe C.
4662
Basic M.
6431

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Mirza Basic 4-6 6-4 6-3 in the Lugano CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Cedrik Marcel Stebe came in ranked #366, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Cedrik Marcel Stebe extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-08-28US OpenQ2hardCedrik Marcel Stebe6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Basic M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
75
56
Break points won·Slight edge
10
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
66
Tiebreaks·Even
68
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stebe C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Basic M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.
Riedi L.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Nardi L.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Riedi L.
Herbert P.[4]
3-67-637-63
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.
Kym J.
4-66-37-67
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.
6-16-1
Herbert P.[4]
Copil M.
2-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Huesler M.
6-27-64
R16
Kym J.
Kotov P.
3-66-26-1
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Sugita Y.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Virtanen O.
6-16-4
Herbert P.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-5
Huesler M.
Dzumhur D.[5]
6-36-2
Riedi L.
Added D.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Basic M.
4-66-46-3
R32
Setkic A.
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Nardi L.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-4
Basic M.
Moraing M.[3]
7-646-3
Sugita Y.
Chung Y.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.
Stricker D.[8]
6-37-5
Copil M.
Novak D.[6]
6-42-66-3
Virtanen O.
Feldbausch K.
6-16-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Brouwer G.
7-646-747-5
Herbert P.[4]
Horansky F.
7-626-4
Dzumhur D.[5]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-2
Huesler M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Added D.
Masur D.
6-47-5
Riedi L.
Cressy M.[1]
7-626-736-4
Stebe C.
Zuk K.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Muller A.
6-37-62
Kotov P.
Albot R.[2]
6-26-3