Mirza Basic vs Mats Moraing — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
hard
GER3
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
Basic M.
7-6 6-3
Moraing M.
Basic M.
7762
Moraing M.
6430

Mirza Basic defeated Mats Moraing 7-6 6-3 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mirza Basic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Basic M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Moraing M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Basic M.Moraing M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
7.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Basic M.Moraing M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
40
Break points saved·Dominant
56
86
Break points won·Clear edge
4
18
Deciding sets·Even
66
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
67
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Basic M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Moraing M.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.2
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.4
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.
Riedi L.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Nardi L.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Riedi L.
Herbert P.[4]
3-67-637-63
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.
Kym J.
4-66-37-67
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.
6-16-1
Herbert P.[4]
Copil M.
2-66-46-4
Riedi L.
Huesler M.
6-27-64
R16
Kym J.
Kotov P.
3-66-26-1
Nardi L.
Setkic A.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Sugita Y.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Virtanen O.
6-16-4
Herbert P.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-5
Huesler M.
Dzumhur D.[5]
6-36-2
Riedi L.
Added D.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Basic M.
4-66-46-3
R32
Setkic A.
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Nardi L.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-4
Basic M.
Moraing M.[3]
7-646-3
Sugita Y.
Chung Y.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.
Stricker D.[8]
6-37-5
Copil M.
Novak D.[6]
6-42-66-3
Virtanen O.
Feldbausch K.
6-16-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Brouwer G.
7-646-747-5
Herbert P.[4]
Horansky F.
7-626-4
Dzumhur D.[5]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-2
Huesler M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Added D.
Masur D.
6-47-5
Riedi L.
Cressy M.[1]
7-626-736-4
Stebe C.
Zuk K.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Muller A.
6-37-62
Kotov P.
Albot R.[2]
6-26-3