Pablo Andujar vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Marbella CH Quarter-final

Marbella CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESP3
Pablo Andujar
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 March 2022
clay
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Andujar P.
6-2 6-4
Tseng C.
Andujar P.
662
Tseng C.
240

Pablo Andujar defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 6-2 6-4 in the Marbella CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Andujar P.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Andujar P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Andujar P.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.1
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Andujar P.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
38
26
Break points saved·Even
86
83
Break points won·Dominant
40
15
Deciding sets·Slight edge
41
31
Tiebreaks·Even
23
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Andujar P.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tseng C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
8.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.9
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[6]
Cachin P.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Munar J.[6]
Vesely J.[4]
6-36-4
Cachin P.
Andujar P.[3]
5-76-16-3
Quarter-finals
Vesely J.[4]
Carballes Baena R.[5]
6-26-4
Andujar P.[3]
Tseng C.
6-26-4
Cachin P.
Kohlschreiber P.
7-656-2
Munar J.[6]
Molcan A.[2]
7-646-2
R16
Vesely J.[4]
Gombos N.
6-47-65
Tseng C.
Ymer E.
6-47-5
Andujar P.[3]
Hanfmann Y.
6-46-0
Kohlschreiber P.
Taberner C.[8]
4-66-36-4
Cachin P.
Guinard M.
6-46-0
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Gaio F.
6-47-64
Molcan A.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-34-67-64
Munar J.[6]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
R32
Zapata Miralles B.
Brancaccio R.
6-36-4
Alvarez Varona N.
Klein L.
7-656-4
Vesely J.[4]
Kuznetsov A.
6-727-636-1
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Milojevic N.
6-37-61
Tseng C.
Cecchinato M.[7]
6-26-756-3
Taberner C.[8]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-47-5
Kohlschreiber P.
Lehecka J.
2-66-26-1
Guinard M.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-27-63
Cachin P.
Thiem D.[1]
6-36-4
Munar J.[6]
Shevchenko A.
6-26-2
Molcan A.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-37-63
Andujar P.[3]
Pellegrino A.
6-14-66-2
Gombos N.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Ymer E.
Wawrinka S.
6-26-4
Hanfmann Y.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-0
Gaio F.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-11-0