Dominic Stricker vs Yuichi Sugita — Biel CH Round of 32

Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Dominic Stricker
SUI3
Dominic Stricker
#360ATP
1533ELO
1509Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
JPN
Yuichi Sugita
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Stricker D.
7-6 6-1
Sugita Y.
Stricker D.
7762
Sugita Y.
6510

Dominic Stricker defeated Yuichi Sugita 7-6 6-1 in the Biel CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Dominic Stricker came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Dominic Stricker came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stricker D.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Sugita Y.

Sugita Y.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Stricker D.

Serve advantage — Stricker D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stricker D.Sugita Y.
1st serve in·Even
57%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
58%
Return points won·Even
36%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stricker D.Sugita Y.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
86
Break points won·Dominant
9
40
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stricker D.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Sugita Y.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 240 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.6
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Stricker D.Sugita Y.
Freshness·
88
—

Stricker D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Zuk K.
7-636-4
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Horansky F.
0-66-46-4
Zuk K.
Stricker D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63