Elias Ymer vs Tennys Sandgren — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Elias Ymer
SWE21
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Ymer E.
6-7 6-2 6-2
Sandgren T.
Ymer E.
67662
Sandgren T.
79221

Elias Ymer defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-7 6-2 6-2 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
8.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 118). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
92
Break points won·Clear edge
23
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
4.5
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
4.9
Country comfort
6.6
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Sandgren T.
Freshness·
100
—

Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4