Shintaro Mochizuki vs Holger Rune — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Shintaro Mochizuki
JPN
Shintaro Mochizuki
#115ATP
1475ELO
1425Hard ELO
$243kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Holger Rune
DEN2
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1725Hard ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Mochizuki S.
6-1 0-0
Rune H.
Mochizuki S.
60–
Rune H.
10–

Shintaro Mochizuki advanced when Holger Rune retired 6-1 0-0 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mochizuki S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Rune H.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mochizuki S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mochizuki S.Rune H.
—
Serve
47
—
Return
58

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mochizuki S.Rune H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
5.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mochizuki S.Rune H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
91
Break points saved·Dominant
74
99
Break points won·Dominant
55
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
47
98
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
80
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mochizuki S.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Rune H.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.2Hard Elo 1425
Surface ELO
8.8+299 Hard Elo edge
1.6Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
8.4Overall Elo 1757
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.2
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mochizuki S.Rune H.
Freshness·
86
—

Mochizuki S.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4