Jelle Sels vs Daniel Masur — Biel CH Round of 32

Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Jelle Sels
#524ATP
1313ELO
1333Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Daniel Masur
GER6
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
Sels J.
6-3 4-6 6-3
Masur D.
Sels J.
6462
Masur D.
3631

Jelle Sels defeated Daniel Masur 6-3 4-6 6-3 in the Biel CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Masur came in ranked #386, defending last year's round of 32, but Jelle Sels had arrived on a 3-match winning run.

Key context

  • Match story: Jelle Sels closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sels J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Masur D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sels J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sels J.Masur D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 179). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sels J.Masur D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
15
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
73
Break points won·Even
4
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
15
Tiebreaks·Even
11
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sels J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Masur D.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1333
Surface ELO
5.6+50 Hard Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1313
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1413
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.6
Surface form
3.6
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.3
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sels J.Masur D.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Sels J.: 20 days rest · Masur D.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Zuk K.
7-636-4
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Horansky F.
0-66-46-4
Zuk K.
Stricker D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63