Andreas Seppi vs Tomas Machac — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
ITA16
Andreas Seppi
42 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Seppi A.
2-6 6-3 6-2
Machac T.
Seppi A.
2662
Machac T.
6321

Andreas Seppi defeated Tomas Machac 2-6 6-3 6-2 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seppi A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Seppi A.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Seppi A.Machac T.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Seppi A.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
54%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.4
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (34 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seppi A.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
90
Break points saved·Even
94
98
Break points won·Dominant
45
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
32
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Seppi A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Machac T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
4.3
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
4.5
Country comfort
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4