Kacper Zuk vs Pavel Kotov — Biel CH Round of 16

Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Pavel Kotov
RUS5
Pavel Kotov
#246ATP
1597ELO
1601Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Zuk K.
6-4 6-4
Kotov P.
Zuk K.
662
Kotov P.
440

Kacper Zuk defeated Pavel Kotov 6-4 6-4 in the Biel CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Pavel Kotov came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Kacper Zuk claimed a first win over Pavel Kotov in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Kacper Zuk edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-09-20Nur-SultanQ1hardPavel Kotov6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Zuk K.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kotov P.

Kotov P.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zuk K.Kotov P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zuk K.Kotov P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
18
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
94
Break points won·Even
9
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
19
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zuk K.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Kotov P.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
2.9
Surface form
6.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Zuk K.
7-636-4
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Horansky F.
0-66-46-4
Zuk K.
Stricker D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63