Tim Van Rijthoven vs Evgeny Karlovskiy — Biel CH Round of 16
Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited- Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
8.0
Surface form4.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transitionContext
8.5
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Van Rijthoven T.
672
Karlovskiy E.
250
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form63%1st serve in+6%69%
77%1st serve points won+12%65%
54%2nd serve points won+11%43%
68%Service points won+10%58%
30%Return points won+6%36%
62%Break points saved+5%57%
12.8Aces / match+9.92.9
3.7Double faults / match+1.91.8
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
R32
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4