Dino Prizmic vs Denis Istomin — Zadar CH Round of 32

Zadar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Dino Prizmic
CRO
Dino Prizmic
#84ATP
1841ELO
1803Clay ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
clay
UZB
Denis Istomin
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Prizmic D.
7-5 6-3
Istomin D.
Prizmic D.
762
Istomin D.
530

Dino Prizmic defeated Denis Istomin 7-5 6-3 in the Zadar CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Dino Prizmic closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Prizmic D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Istomin D.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Serve advantage — Prizmic D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Prizmic D.Istomin D.
44
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Prizmic D.Istomin D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
5.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Prizmic D.Istomin D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
29
Break points saved·Even
92
90
Break points won·Dominant
64
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
44
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
37
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Prizmic D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Istomin D.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Prizmic D.Istomin D.
Freshness·
87
—

Prizmic D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cobolli F.[6]
Michalski D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Cobolli F.[6]
Guinard M.[8]
6-23-66-3
Michalski D.
Sanchez Jover C.
3-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-17-5
Guinard M.[8]
Vavassori A.
6-46-4
Michalski D.
Svrcina D.
6-36-1
Sanchez Jover C.
Ajdukovic D.
7-636-3
R16
Esteve Lobato E.
Brancaccio R.
6-32-66-2
Vavassori A.
Medjedovic H.
6-16-4
Michalski D.
Fatic N.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.
Martin A.[3]
4-66-26-2
Ajdukovic D.
Giustino L.
6-47-61
Guinard M.[8]
Zekic M.
6-36-4
Cobolli F.[6]
Prizmic D.
2-67-56-2
Sanchez Jover C.
Cretu C.
6-46-1
R32
Esteve Lobato E.
Milojevic N.[2]
3-66-26-3
Brancaccio R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-27-5
Prizmic D.
Istomin D.
7-56-3
Cobolli F.[6]
Serdarusic N.
1-66-46-1
Medjedovic H.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-27-67
Zekic M.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Guinard M.[8]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-2
Fatic N.
Kuzmanov D.[7]
6-27-65
Michalski D.
Poljicak M.
6-24-67-5
Svrcina D.
Arnaldi M.
6-26-2
Sanchez Jover C.
Agamenone F.[5]
6-40-66-1
Giustino L.
Piros Z.
6-45-77-5
Ajdukovic D.
Mager G.[1]
6-26-2
Cretu C.
Elias G.
6-26-4
Vavassori A.
Zhang Z.
6-27-63
Martin A.[3]
Balzerani R.
6-36-3