Robin Haase vs Illya Marchenko — Lille CH Round of 32

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Robin Haase
39 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Haase R.
7-6 6-7 6-2
Marchenko I.
Haase R.
7106162
Marchenko I.
687721

Robin Haase defeated Illya Marchenko 7-6 6-7 6-2 in the Lille CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Robin Haase came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Robin Haase extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Robin Haase closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-03-04Davis Cup G1 R1: UKR vs NEDRRhardRobin Haase6-7(0) 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Haase R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Haase R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Haase R.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 140). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Haase R.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
13
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
80
Break points won·Clear edge
24
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
14
Tiebreaks·Even
13
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Haase R.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marchenko I.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.9
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Halys Q.[2]
Berankis R.[1]
4-67-646-4
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[2]
Lestienne C.[8]
7-664-66-4
Berankis R.[1]
Forejtek J.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Lestienne C.[8]
Fils A.
6-36-2
Berankis R.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-46-3
Halys Q.[2]
Bergs Z.[7]
7-633-66-3
Forejtek J.
Jaziri M.
7-656-1
R16
Fils A.
Haase R.
7-656-4
Bergs Z.[7]
Lokoli L.
6-23-66-3
Forejtek J.
Blancaneaux G.
6-14-67-68
Galarneau A.
Barrere G.[5]
6-46-2
Berankis R.[1]
Kamke T.
3-66-16-2
Lestienne C.[8]
Cuenin S.
6-46-1
Halys Q.[2]
Sachko V.
6-46-4
Jaziri M.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
R32
Durasovic V.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-33-62-2
Cuenin S.
Nardi L.
3-66-36-0
Halys Q.[2]
Basic M.
6-16-3
Haase R.
Marchenko I.
7-686-716-2
Lestienne C.[8]
Uchida K.
7-606-2
Jaziri M.
Maden Y.
7-636-3
Blancaneaux G.
Janvier M.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Dzumhur D.[3]
7-627-5
Barrere G.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-1
Galarneau A.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
1-66-46-2
Kamke T.
Squire H.
6-26-4
Berankis R.[1]
Furness E.
6-05-76-1
Bergs Z.[7]
Hoang A.
6-34-66-4
Sachko V.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Lokoli L.
Beaupain S.
6-16-1
Fils A.
Safiullin R.[4]
6-27-63