Yoshihito Nishioka vs Egor Gerasimov — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Yoshihito Nishioka
JPN4
Yoshihito Nishioka
#176ATP
1689ELO
1659Hard ELO
$42kYTD
$7.5MCAREER
30 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Nishioka Y.
6-4 6-2
Gerasimov E.
Nishioka Y.
662
Gerasimov E.
420

Yoshihito Nishioka defeated Egor Gerasimov 6-4 6-2 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Yoshihito Nishioka came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 128. Yoshihito Nishioka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-16Cincinnati MastersQ1hardYoshihito Nishioka6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Nishioka Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Gerasimov E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nishioka Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nishioka Y.Gerasimov E.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.3
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nishioka Y.Gerasimov E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
84
44
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
88
Break points won·Dominant
59
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nishioka Y.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gerasimov E.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.2
Surface form
2.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
5.6
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4