Marek Gengel vs Borna Gojo — Biel CH Round of 16

Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Gengel M.
7-6 4-6 6-1
Gojo B.
Gengel M.
78462
Gojo B.
66611

Marek Gengel defeated Borna Gojo 7-6 4-6 6-1 in the Biel CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Borna Gojo came in ranked #168, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Marek Gengel came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gengel M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gengel M.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gengel M.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
11
53
Break points saved·Dominant
35
95
Break points won·Even
10
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
54
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gengel M.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 105 days (−1.5)
Gojo B.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
1.4Hard Elo 1377
Surface ELO
8.6+285 Hard Elo edge
1.6Overall Elo 1411
ELO gap
8.4Overall Elo 1683
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
8.5
0.0
Win streak
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gengel M.Gojo B.
Freshness·
—
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Zuk K.
7-636-4
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Horansky F.
0-66-46-4
Zuk K.
Stricker D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63