Hugo Gaston vs Emilio Nava — Miami Masters Round of 128

Miami Masters · ATP · Round of 128
Hugo Gaston
FRA
Hugo Gaston
#118ATP
1622ELO
1628Hard ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Gaston H.
6-2 6-1
Nava E.
Gaston H.
662
Nava E.
210

Hugo Gaston defeated Emilio Nava 6-2 6-1 in the Miami Masters round of 128 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #86, defending last year's round of 128.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaston H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gaston H.Nava E.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gaston H.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaston H.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
73
52
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Dominant
57
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
78
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaston H.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+7 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Hard Elo 1621
4.4Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
6.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gaston H.Nava E.
Freshness·Dominant
64
95

Gaston H.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 65 games (7d) · Nava E.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Final
Alcaraz C.[14]
Ruud C.[6]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[14]
Hurkacz H.[8]
7-657-62
Ruud C.[6]
Cerundolo F.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.
Sinner J.[9]
4-1
Ruud C.[6]
Zverev A.[2]
6-31-66-3
Hurkacz H.[8]
Medvedev D.[1]
7-676-3
Alcaraz C.[14]
Kecmanovic M.
6-756-37-65
R16
Hurkacz H.[8]
Harris L.
7-636-2
Cerundolo F.
Tiafoe F.[28]
6-727-636-2
Ruud C.[6]
Norrie C.[10]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Brooksby J.
7-56-1
Sinner J.[9]
Kyrgios N.
7-636-3
Zverev A.[2]
Kokkinakis T.
6-46-4
Alcaraz C.[14]
Tsitsipas S.[3]
7-56-3
Kecmanovic M.
Fritz T.[11]
3-66-16-4
R32
Medvedev D.[1]
Martinez P.
6-36-4
Brooksby J.
Bautista Agut R.[15]
6-35-76-4
Hurkacz H.[8]
Karatsev A.[29]
7-54-66-3
Tsitsipas S.[3]
De Minaur A.[25]
6-46-3
Alcaraz C.[14]
Cilic M.[21]
6-46-4
Kyrgios N.
Fognini F.[31]
6-26-4
Cerundolo F.
Monfils G.[22]
6-26-3
Tiafoe F.[28]
Cerundolo J.
6-36-2
Ruud C.[6]
Bublik A.[30]
6-36-2
Norrie C.[10]
Gaston H.
6-37-5
Kokkinakis T.
Kudla D.
7-654-67-64
Zverev A.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-2
Kecmanovic M.
Korda S.
7-646-3
Fritz T.[11]
Paul T.
7-626-4
Sinner J.[9]
Carreno Busta P.[17]
5-77-57-5
Harris L.
Nishioka Y.
7-654-67-5
R64
Norrie C.[10]
Draper J.
7-656-4
Cerundolo F.
Opelka R.[16]
6-13-1
Monfils G.[22]
Otte O.
7-696-1
Tiafoe F.[28]
Nakashima B.
3-67-656-4
Cerundolo J.
Anderson K.
7-673-66-3
Kudla D.
Sonego L.[19]
3-67-656-4
Alcaraz C.[14]
Fucsovics M.
6-36-2
Bublik A.[30]
Galan D.
6-776-36-4
Brooksby J.
Basilashvili N.[18]
6-36-1
Kyrgios N.
Rublev A.[5]
6-36-0
Fognini F.[31]
Daniel T.
6-716-27-65
Medvedev D.[1]
Murray A.
6-46-2
Martinez P.
Garin C.[27]
7-626-2
Bautista Agut R.[15]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-3
Harris L.
Shapovalov D.[12]
6-36-4
Nishioka Y.
Evans D.[24]
3-66-46-3
Karatsev A.[29]
Humbert U.
7-56-2
Hurkacz H.[8]
Rinderknech A.
7-656-2
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Wolf J.
6-46-756-1
De Minaur A.[25]
Thompson J.
6-26-3
Cilic M.[21]
Popyrin A.
6-06-3
Fritz T.[11]
Kukushkin M.
6-35-76-3
Paul T.
Khachanov K.[23]
6-43-67-63
Korda S.
Ramos A.[32]
4-67-666-3
Kecmanovic M.
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
6-46-2
Carreno Busta P.[17]
Goffin D.
6-36-2
Sinner J.[9]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-43-67-68
Ruud C.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-16-2
Gaston H.
Isner J.[20]
7-656-4
Kokkinakis T.
Schwartzman D.[13]
4-67-636-4
Mcdonald M.
Dimitrov G.[26]
6-16-4
Zverev A.[2]
Coric B.
6-43-66-3
R128
Draper J.
Simon G.
7-56-1
Galan D.
Millman J.
6-46-2
Martinez P.
Struff J.
6-32-0
Nishioka Y.
Gomez E.
6-26-726-1
Rinderknech A.
Djere L.
6-27-66
Thompson J.
Tsonga J.
6-716-46-4
Coric B.
Verdasco F.
6-47-5
Kukushkin M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-4
Murray A.
Delbonis F.
7-646-1
Brooksby J.
Coria F.
3-66-26-3
Majchrzak K.
Baez S.
6-46-3
Harris L.
Bagnis F.
6-36-3
Humbert U.
Bedene A.
6-33-66-3
Wolf J.
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
Popyrin A.
Musetti L.
7-57-65
Fucsovics M.
Giron M.
6-36-4
Paul T.
Bonzi B.
6-46-4
Korda S.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-16-1
Kecmanovic M.
Sock J.
7-636-4
Kyrgios N.
Mannarino A.
7-636-3
Daniel T.
Munar J.
6-36-4
Goffin D.
Carballes Baena R.
6-26-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Cressy M.
6-36-2
Cerundolo F.
Griekspoor T.
7-54-66-3
Otte O.
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Nakashima B.
Kwon S.
6-17-5
Cerundolo J.
Lajovic D.
6-37-5
Laaksonen H.
Paire B.
7-681-66-4
Gaston H.
Nava E.
6-26-1
Kokkinakis T.
Gasquet R.
6-46-2
Kudla D.
Shang J.
6-737-56-4
Mcdonald M.
Koepfer D.
6-786-46-4