Jonas Forejtek vs Malek Jaziri — Lille CH Quarter-final

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#315ATP
1387ELO
1333Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
TUN
Malek Jaziri
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Forejtek J.
7-6 6-1
Jaziri M.
Forejtek J.
7762
Jaziri M.
6510

Jonas Forejtek defeated Malek Jaziri 7-6 6-1 in the Lille CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jonas Forejtek came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Jonas Forejtek came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Forejtek J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Jaziri M.

Jaziri M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Serve advantage — Forejtek J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Forejtek J.Jaziri M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Forejtek J.Jaziri M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
31
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
83
Break points won·Even
6
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
55
Tiebreaks·Even
15
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Forejtek J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Jaziri M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Halys Q.[2]
Berankis R.[1]
4-67-646-4
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[2]
Lestienne C.[8]
7-664-66-4
Berankis R.[1]
Forejtek J.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Lestienne C.[8]
Fils A.
6-36-2
Berankis R.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-46-3
Halys Q.[2]
Bergs Z.[7]
7-633-66-3
Forejtek J.
Jaziri M.
7-656-1
R16
Fils A.
Haase R.
7-656-4
Bergs Z.[7]
Lokoli L.
6-23-66-3
Forejtek J.
Blancaneaux G.
6-14-67-68
Galarneau A.
Barrere G.[5]
6-46-2
Berankis R.[1]
Kamke T.
3-66-16-2
Lestienne C.[8]
Cuenin S.
6-46-1
Halys Q.[2]
Sachko V.
6-46-4
Jaziri M.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
R32
Durasovic V.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-33-62-2
Cuenin S.
Nardi L.
3-66-36-0
Halys Q.[2]
Basic M.
6-16-3
Haase R.
Marchenko I.
7-686-716-2
Lestienne C.[8]
Uchida K.
7-606-2
Jaziri M.
Maden Y.
7-636-3
Blancaneaux G.
Janvier M.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Dzumhur D.[3]
7-627-5
Barrere G.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-1
Galarneau A.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
1-66-46-2
Kamke T.
Squire H.
6-26-4
Berankis R.[1]
Furness E.
6-05-76-1
Bergs Z.[7]
Hoang A.
6-34-66-4
Sachko V.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Lokoli L.
Beaupain S.
6-16-1
Fils A.
Safiullin R.[4]
6-27-63