Daniel Michalski vs Nerman Fatic — Zadar CH Round of 16

Zadar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Daniel Michalski
POL
Daniel Michalski
#299ATP
1435ELO
1386Clay ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Michalski D.
7-5 6-1
Fatic N.
Michalski D.
762
Fatic N.
510

Daniel Michalski defeated Nerman Fatic 7-5 6-1 in the Zadar CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Michalski came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Michalski D.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Michalski D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Michalski D.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
58%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Michalski D.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
24
Break points saved·Dominant
24
63
Break points won·Slight edge
26
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
62
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Michalski D.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 112 days (−1.5)
Fatic N.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.3Clay Elo 1386
Surface ELO
6.7+92 Clay Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1435
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Michalski D.Fatic N.
Freshness·
73
—

Michalski D.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cobolli F.[6]
Michalski D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Cobolli F.[6]
Guinard M.[8]
6-23-66-3
Michalski D.
Sanchez Jover C.
3-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-17-5
Guinard M.[8]
Vavassori A.
6-46-4
Michalski D.
Svrcina D.
6-36-1
Sanchez Jover C.
Ajdukovic D.
7-636-3
R16
Esteve Lobato E.
Brancaccio R.
6-32-66-2
Vavassori A.
Medjedovic H.
6-16-4
Michalski D.
Fatic N.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.
Martin A.[3]
4-66-26-2
Ajdukovic D.
Giustino L.
6-47-61
Guinard M.[8]
Zekic M.
6-36-4
Cobolli F.[6]
Prizmic D.
2-67-56-2
Sanchez Jover C.
Cretu C.
6-46-1
R32
Esteve Lobato E.
Milojevic N.[2]
3-66-26-3
Brancaccio R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-27-5
Prizmic D.
Istomin D.
7-56-3
Cobolli F.[6]
Serdarusic N.
1-66-46-1
Medjedovic H.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-27-67
Zekic M.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Guinard M.[8]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-2
Fatic N.
Kuzmanov D.[7]
6-27-65
Michalski D.
Poljicak M.
6-24-67-5
Svrcina D.
Arnaldi M.
6-26-2
Sanchez Jover C.
Agamenone F.[5]
6-40-66-1
Giustino L.
Piros Z.
6-45-77-5
Ajdukovic D.
Mager G.[1]
6-26-2
Cretu C.
Elias G.
6-26-4
Vavassori A.
Zhang Z.
6-27-63
Martin A.[3]
Balzerani R.
6-36-3