Kacper Zuk vs Antoine Escoffier — Biel CH Quarter-final

Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Zuk K.
7-6 6-2
Escoffier A.
Zuk K.
7762
Escoffier A.
6220

Kacper Zuk defeated Antoine Escoffier 7-6 6-2 in the Biel CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Antoine Escoffier came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Kacper Zuk closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zuk K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zuk K.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.2
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zuk K.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
18
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
68
Break points won·Slight edge
9
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
25
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zuk K.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Escoffier A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.9
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Zuk K.
7-636-4
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Horansky F.
0-66-46-4
Zuk K.
Stricker D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63