Antoine Escoffier vs Dennis Novak — Biel CH Round of 32

Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
AUT2
Dennis Novak
#818ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
Escoffier A.
6-4 6-2
Novak D.
Escoffier A.
662
Novak D.
420

Antoine Escoffier defeated Dennis Novak 6-4 6-2 in the Biel CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Antoine Escoffier came in ranked #753, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Novak D.

Novak D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Novak D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
3.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 184). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Novak D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
80
Break points won·Even
18
15
Deciding sets·Clear edge
11
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Novak D.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Zuk K.
7-636-4
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Horansky F.
0-66-46-4
Zuk K.
Stricker D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63