Nicolas Kicker vs Matthew Ebden — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1345Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
AUS
Matthew Ebden
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Kicker N.
6-2 6-1
Ebden M.
Kicker N.
662
Ebden M.
210

Nicolas Kicker defeated Matthew Ebden 6-2 6-1 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Matthew Ebden came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Nicolas Kicker claimed a first win over Matthew Ebden in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-10-02TokyoQ1hardMatthew Ebden6-4 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ebden M.

Ebden M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Serve advantage — Kicker N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Ebden M.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
41%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
34%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.1
6.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (171 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kicker N.Ebden M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
45
Break points saved·Dominant
56
86
Break points won·Clear edge
45
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
58
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
51
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kicker N.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ebden M.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Country comfort
4.2
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Ebden M.
Freshness·
100
—

Kicker N.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4