Taro Daniel vs Max Purcell — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Taro Daniel
JPN10
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Daniel T.
6-2 6-2
Purcell M.
Daniel T.
662
Purcell M.
220

Taro Daniel defeated Max Purcell 6-2 6-2 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Taro Daniel came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-01-08AucklandR16hardTaro Daniel6-2 6-4
2020-02-24AcapulcoQ1hardTaro Daniel6-3 4-3 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
7.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
59
Break points saved·Even
93
92
Break points won·Dominant
37
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
84
Tiebreaks·Even
81
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Daniel T.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Purcell M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.8
Surface form
5.1
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
6.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
4.9
Country comfort
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Purcell M.
Freshness·
69
—

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4