Taro Daniel vs Bjorn Fratangelo — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 2

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Taro Daniel
JPN10
Taro Daniel
#203ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
USA24
Bjorn Fratangelo
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Daniel T.
6-1 7-6
Fratangelo B.
Daniel T.
6772
Fratangelo B.
1640

Taro Daniel defeated Bjorn Fratangelo 6-1 7-6 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Taro Daniel came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Taro Daniel came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-05-01EstorilR16clayTaro Daniel6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fratangelo B.

Fratangelo B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Fratangelo B.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Fratangelo B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
88
Break points won·Clear edge
37
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
87
Tiebreaks·Even
81
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Daniel T.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fratangelo B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
4.9
Country comfort
6.7
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Fratangelo B.
Freshness·
72
—

Daniel T.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4