Daniel Elahi Galan vs Martin Damm — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL9
Daniel Elahi Galan
#297ATP
1531ELO
1497Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Galan D.
6-3 6-4
Damm M.
Galan D.
662
Damm M.
340

Daniel Elahi Galan defeated Martin Damm 6-3 6-4 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #106.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Galan D.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galan D.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.3
12.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galan D.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
26
Break points saved·Even
92
93
Break points won·Clear edge
21
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Galan D.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Damm M.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 133 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.1Hard Elo 1497
Surface ELO
6.9+160 Hard Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1531
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Country comfort
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Galan D.Damm M.
Freshness·
—
91

Damm M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 57%
Q2
Sock J.
Johnson S.[12]
6-26-2
Daniel T.[10]
Fratangelo B.[24]
6-17-64
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Seppi A.[16]
6-36-4
Galan D.[9]
Kicker N.
5-76-36-4
Wolf J.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[8]
Blanch U.
7-682-66-3
Verdasco F.
Grenier H.
6-37-68
Gomez E.[23]
Gojowczyk P.[5]
3-67-646-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Eubanks C.
2-67-616-1
Kukushkin M.
Mochizuki S.
7-666-2
Krueger M.
Anderson K.[3]
7-657-5
Munar J.[7]
Ymer E.[21]
7-56-3
Q1
Johnson S.[12]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[23]
Tirante T.
7-644-66-3
Grenier H.
Pospisil V.[20]
6-47-65
Verdasco F.
Sousa J.[1]
6-44-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Rune H.[2]
6-10-0
Blanch U.
Moraing M.[19]
6-43-1
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Stebe C.
6-26-2
Ymer E.[21]
Sandgren T.
6-776-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
6-16-3
Wolf J.
Querrey S.[11]
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Albot R.[14]
4-67-676-2
Daniel T.[10]
Purcell M.
6-26-2
Galan D.[9]
Damm M.
6-36-4
Anderson K.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Vukic A.[18]
6-42-66-4
Seppi A.[16]
Machac T.
2-66-36-2
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.[15]
6-26-2
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-2
Munar J.[7]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[24]
Clarke J.
6-26-1
Kudla D.[8]
Heide G.
6-756-46-3
Kicker N.
Ebden M.
6-26-1
Eubanks C.
Broady L.[17]
6-46-2
Popko D.
Monteiro T.[13]
6-44-66-4