Pablo Cuevas vs Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Round of 32

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
URU2
Pablo Cuevas
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
clay
BOL
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
Cuevas P.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Cuevas P.
6362
Dellien Velasco M.
4631

Pablo Cuevas defeated Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Pablo Cuevas closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cuevas P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Dellien Velasco M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Cuevas P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cuevas P.Dellien Velasco M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cuevas P.Dellien Velasco M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
19
Break points saved·Dominant
93
28
Break points won·Clear edge
32
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
63
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cuevas P.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Dellien Velasco M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.3
Surface form
6.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jubb P.
Varillas J.[3]
6-37-65
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[3]
Cuevas P.[2]
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Cuevas P.[2]
Olivieri G.
3-66-16-2
Varillas J.[3]
Mena F.[7]
6-47-5
Dutra Da Silva D.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-46-3
Jubb P.
Casanova H.
6-37-64
R16
Casanova H.
De Jong J.[8]
4-0
Cuevas P.[2]
Diez S.
6-46-1
Mena F.[7]
Ritschard A.
2-67-656-4
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-36-4
Dutra Da Silva D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-4
Jubb P.
Torres J.
6-26-3
Varillas J.[3]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Olivieri G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-646-4
R32
Cuevas P.[2]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-43-66-3
Diez S.
Juarez F.
6-07-65
Olivieri G.
Barrientos N.
2-67-646-2
Varillas J.[3]
Olivo R.
6-26-2
Nikles J.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-4
Ritschard A.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-1
Mena F.[7]
Oliveira G.
7-56-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Lama G.
7-56-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-36-4
Dutra Da Silva D.
Melzer G.
6-26-3
De Jong J.[8]
Oliel Y.
7-616-3
Casanova H.
Denolly C.
6-47-5
Torres J.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Nakagawa N.
6-26-4
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Hardt N.
6-33-66-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Villanueva G.
7-57-64