Marius Copil vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras — Biel CH Round of 32

Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
ESP
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Copil M.
6-2 6-3
Menendez Maceiras A.
Copil M.
662
Menendez Maceiras A.
230

Marius Copil defeated Adrian Menendez Maceiras 6-2 6-3 in the Biel CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Menendez Maceiras A.

Menendez Maceiras A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Menendez Maceiras A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (114 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Menendez Maceiras A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
21
Break points saved·Dominant
91
54
Break points won·Even
3
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
32
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Menendez Maceiras A.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
1.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.
Zuk K.
7-636-4
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Horansky F.
0-66-46-4
Zuk K.
Stricker D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63