Paul Jubb vs Hernan Casanova — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Quarter-final

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1338Clay ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
clay
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Jubb P.
6-3 7-6
Casanova H.
Jubb P.
6772
Casanova H.
3640

Paul Jubb defeated Hernan Casanova 6-3 7-6 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Paul Jubb closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Casanova H.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Casanova H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
61%
76%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
43%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
0.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 155). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jubb P.Casanova H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
38
8
Break points saved·Dominant
84
24
Break points won·Clear edge
6
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
44
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Casanova H.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1338
Surface ELO
5.6+43 Clay Elo edge
5.3Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1393
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
6.2
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
5.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Casanova H.
Freshness·Dominant
100
70

Jubb P.: 20 days rest · Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jubb P.
Varillas J.[3]
6-37-65
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[3]
Cuevas P.[2]
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Cuevas P.[2]
Olivieri G.
3-66-16-2
Varillas J.[3]
Mena F.[7]
6-47-5
Dutra Da Silva D.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-46-3
Jubb P.
Casanova H.
6-37-64
R16
Casanova H.
De Jong J.[8]
4-0
Cuevas P.[2]
Diez S.
6-46-1
Mena F.[7]
Ritschard A.
2-67-656-4
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-36-4
Dutra Da Silva D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-4
Jubb P.
Torres J.
6-26-3
Varillas J.[3]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Olivieri G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-646-4
R32
Cuevas P.[2]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-43-66-3
Diez S.
Juarez F.
6-07-65
Olivieri G.
Barrientos N.
2-67-646-2
Varillas J.[3]
Olivo R.
6-26-2
Nikles J.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-4
Ritschard A.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-1
Mena F.[7]
Oliveira G.
7-56-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Lama G.
7-56-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-36-4
Dutra Da Silva D.
Melzer G.
6-26-3
De Jong J.[8]
Oliel Y.
7-616-3
Casanova H.
Denolly C.
6-47-5
Torres J.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Nakagawa N.
6-26-4
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Hardt N.
6-33-66-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Villanueva G.
7-57-64