Marek Gengel vs Ruben Bemelmans — Biel CH Round of 32
Biel CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2022
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
4.0
Surface form4.3
0.0
Win streak0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts6.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Gengel M.
77772
Bemelmans R.
64630
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form64%1st serve in+3%61%
72%1st serve points won+1%71%
50%2nd serve points won+1%51%
64%Service points won64%
43%Return points won+8%35%
53%Break points saved+12%65%
5.4Aces / match+1.16.5
2.2Double faults / match+1.13.3
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Stricker D.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Escoffier A.
7-626-2
R16
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
6-43-67-63
Riedi L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Stricker D.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-63
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Zuk K.
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Gojo B.
7-664-66-1
Horansky F.
Feldbausch K.
7-667-65
Rodionov J.
Sels J.
6-46-4
R32
Zuk K.
Soeda G.
6-36-2
Riedi L.
Brouwer G.
1-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Herbert P.[1]
6-706-36-3
Gengel M.
Bemelmans R.
7-647-63
Karlovskiy E.
Schnur B.
6-756-37-5
Stricker D.[3]
Sugita Y.
7-656-1
Van Rijthoven T.[8]
Kravchenko G.
7-647-5
Kotov P.[5]
Peniston R.
7-676-4
Escoffier A.
Novak D.[2]
6-46-2
Feldbausch K.
Huesler M.[7]
7-56-0
Rodionov J.
Setkic A.
6-36-4
Horansky F.
Kym J.
6-36-3
Sels J.
Masur D.[6]
6-34-66-3
Copil M.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-3
Kovacevic A.
Li Z.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Moriya H.
7-686-4