Max Purcell vs Nathan Ponwith — Phoenix CH Qualifying Round 1

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
AUS8
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
hard
USA
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Purcell M.
6-4 6-4
Ponwith N.
Purcell M.
662
Ponwith N.
440

Max Purcell defeated Nathan Ponwith 6-4 6-4 in the Phoenix CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Ponwith N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Ponwith N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.5
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ponwith N.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 861 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Kukushkin M.[6]
Fabbiano T.[11]
6-36-2
Purcell M.[8]
Sandgren T.[5]
6-27-5
Simon G.[2]
Machac T.[7]
7-56-1
Kovacevic A.
King E.
6-47-62
Nava E.
Bolt A.[12]
6-27-64
Krueger M.[9]
Moraing M.[1]
6-36-2
Q1
Machac T.[7]
Shang J.
6-36-0
Moraing M.[1]
Jung J.
6-23-67-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Escobar G.
7-57-65
Bolt A.[12]
Blanch U.
6-46-3
Fabbiano T.[11]
Smith J.
6-16-4
Kukushkin M.[6]
Soeda G.
6-26-0
Purcell M.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-46-4
Nava E.
Grenier H.[4]
6-06-1
Kovacevic A.
Clarke J.[10]
4-67-636-4
King E.
Gerasimov E.[3]
6-47-62
Simon G.[2]
Cassone M.
6-36-1
Krueger M.[9]
Svajda Z.
6-746-36-1