Benoit Paire vs Emilio Nava — Phoenix CH Round of 32

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA1
Benoit Paire
#1096ATP
1362ELO
1336Hard ELO
37 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Paire B.
7-5 6-2
Nava E.
Paire B.
762
Nava E.
520

Benoit Paire defeated Emilio Nava 7-5 6-2 in the Phoenix CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Benoit Paire closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paire B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Paire B.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paire B.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paire B.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
52%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
43%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.9
7.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (192 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paire B.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Even
48
52
Break points saved·Even
90
94
Break points won·Clear edge
31
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
58
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paire B.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Nava E.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.5Hard Elo 1336
Surface ELO
8.5+285 Hard Elo edge
0.8Overall Elo 1362
ELO gap
9.2Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Paire B.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.
Altmaier D.
2-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.
Broady L.
7-657-5
Kudla D.
Wolf J.
6-736-47-63
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Verdasco F.
7-56-4
Kudla D.
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Broady L.
Goffin D.[8]
2-66-37-5
Altmaier D.
Albot R.
6-47-5
R16
Kudla D.
Moraing M.
7-627-65
Wolf J.
Musetti L.[2]
6-36-2
Gasquet R.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Altmaier D.
Ruusuvuori E.[7]
6-27-5
Albot R.
Paire B.[1]
6-24-67-5
Broady L.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-36-2
Verdasco F.
Majchrzak K.
2-66-47-65
Goffin D.[8]
Eubanks C.
7-623-66-4
R32
Kudla D.
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Bagnis F.
Baez S.[5]
2-66-36-4
Goffin D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
1-66-36-3
Eubanks C.
Simon G.
6-47-5
Altmaier D.
Vukic A.
6-13-66-4
Albot R.
Otte O.
4-66-46-3
Paire B.[1]
Nava E.
7-56-2
Moraing M.
Struff J.[4]
3-67-626-4
Gasquet R.
Kukushkin M.
6-756-16-1
Verdasco F.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-756-3
Ruusuvuori E.[7]
Nakashima B.
6-36-3
Rinderknech A.[3]
Cerundolo F.
1-66-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Gaston H.[6]
6-736-46-4
Broady L.
Cerundolo J.
6-16-2
Musetti L.[2]
Popyrin A.
6-26-2
Wolf J.
Purcell M.
6-16-3