Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Renzo Olivo — Concepcion CH Semi-final
Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
#28ATP
1849ELO
1795Clay ELO
$1.2MYTD
$6.7MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LLWLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
clay
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.8
H2H4.2
5.7
Surface form3.7
7.03-match win streak
Win streak0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
Minutes 14d8.4
4.0
3-set count8.0
Prev. match8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Etcheverry T.
2662
Olivo R.
6241
Head to head
4–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-15 | Santo Domingo CH | QF | clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2022-08-08 | Lima CH | QF | clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 7-6(5) 6-7(2) 7-5 |
| 2021-10-18 | Buenos Aires CH | R16 | clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 |
| 2021-08-02 | Cordenons CH | R32 | clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 5-7 7-6(3) 7-5 |
| 2021-04-26 | Ostrava CH | QF | clay | Renzo Olivo | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2019-11-04 | Montevideo CH | R64 | clay | Renzo Olivo | 7-6(3) 6-1 |
Statistics
Recent form64%1st serve in+5%59%
74%1st serve points won+9%65%
53%2nd serve points won+9%44%
66%Service points won+10%56%
36%Return points won+2%38%
57%Break points saved+1%58%
5Aces / match+3.31.7
2.2Double faults / match+0.93.1
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Galan D.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
6-42-67-63
Dellien H.[1]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-36-0
Etcheverry T.[3]
Olivo R.
2-66-26-4
Quarter-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-37-61
Lama G.
Mena F.[6]
6-12-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-4
Galan D.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
6-16-2
Etcheverry T.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
7-694-67-5
Dellien H.[1]
Tirante T.
6-06-3
Olivo R.
Varillas J.[2]
7-622-66-2
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-23-66-1
R16
Lama G.
Villanueva G.
2-66-46-4
Cerundolo F.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Mena F.[6]
Rodriguez C.
6-26-4
Galan D.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
4-66-16-2
Dellien H.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-06-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-37-65
Sakamoto P.
Folliot Q.
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Rubin N.
6-26-2
Dellien H.[1]
Jubb P.
6-12-0
Olivo R.
Mena F.[8]
6-36-1
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Diez S.
6-16-2
Varillas J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jarry N.[4]
6-43-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Tirante T.
Furness E.
7-646-0
Etcheverry T.[3]
Lama G.
6-37-61
R32
Cerundolo F.[4]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-56-3
Villanueva G.
Martin A.[2]
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Olivo R.[5]
6-16-1
Alvarez N.
Hidalgo D.
4-67-656-4
Rodriguez C.
Burruchaga R.
W/O
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Reyes Varela M.
6-46-2
Franco Descotte M.
Hernandez F.
6-06-0
Dellien H.[1]
Castro C.
6-06-1
Lama G.
Vernier M.
6-26-2
Mena F.[6]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-34-66-4
Galan D.[3]
Merino A.
6-06-1
Rubin N.
Nunez V.
6-26-2
Kirchheimer S.
Becerra Otarola I.
6-26-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Achondo G.
6-06-0
Dellien H.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-16-0
Olivo R.
De Jong J.
1-67-606-2
Mena F.[8]
Casanova H.
6-10-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Cachin P.
6-33-1
Jarry N.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Varillas J.[2]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-624-66-3
Diez S.
Torres J.
6-46-2
Furness E.
Kopriva V.[6]
6-26-1
Denolly C.
Oliveira G.
6-06-2
Etcheverry T.[3]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-15-76-2
Collarini A.
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Lama G.
Bueno G.
6-46-4
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Juarez F.
3-67-56-3
Tirante T.
Nunez D.
7-656-3
Jubb P.
Olivieri G.
7-56-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Melzer G.
3-66-37-5