Tennys Sandgren vs Gonzalo Escobar — Phoenix CH Qualifying Round 1

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA5
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
hard
ECU
Gonzalo Escobar
37 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLWLLL
Sandgren T.
7-5 7-6
Escobar G.
Sandgren T.
7772
Escobar G.
5650

Tennys Sandgren defeated Gonzalo Escobar 7-5 7-6 in the Phoenix CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escobar G.

Escobar G.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve advantage — Escobar G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Escobar G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
74%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
50%
65%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
Return points won·Clear edge
36%
53%
Break points saved·Dominant
60%
0%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Escobar G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
7
Break points saved·Dominant
92
45
Break points won·Dominant
2
27
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Escobar G.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 238 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Kukushkin M.[6]
Fabbiano T.[11]
6-36-2
Purcell M.[8]
Sandgren T.[5]
6-27-5
Simon G.[2]
Machac T.[7]
7-56-1
Kovacevic A.
King E.
6-47-62
Nava E.
Bolt A.[12]
6-27-64
Krueger M.[9]
Moraing M.[1]
6-36-2
Q1
Machac T.[7]
Shang J.
6-36-0
Moraing M.[1]
Jung J.
6-23-67-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Escobar G.
7-57-65
Bolt A.[12]
Blanch U.
6-46-3
Fabbiano T.[11]
Smith J.
6-16-4
Kukushkin M.[6]
Soeda G.
6-26-0
Purcell M.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-46-4
Nava E.
Grenier H.[4]
6-06-1
Kovacevic A.
Clarke J.[10]
4-67-636-4
King E.
Gerasimov E.[3]
6-47-62
Simon G.[2]
Cassone M.
6-36-1
Krueger M.[9]
Svajda Z.
6-746-36-1