Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Steven Diez — Concepcion CH Round of 16

Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG7
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
clay
CAN
Steven Diez
#1565ATP
35 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-1 6-2
Diez S.
Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Diez S.
120

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Steven Diez 6-1 6-2 in the Concepcion CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #58, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Diez S.

Diez S.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Diez S.
24
Serve
—
36
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Diez S.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
1.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 140). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Diez S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
4
Break points saved·Dominant
90
48
Break points won·Dominant
62
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Diez S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.8
Surface form
1.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Diez S.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Galan D.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
6-13-66-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Galan D.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
6-42-67-63
Etcheverry T.[3]
Olivo R.
2-66-26-4
Dellien H.[1]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-37-61
Galan D.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
6-16-2
Dellien H.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-4
Lama G.
Mena F.[6]
6-12-66-2
Olivo R.
Varillas J.[2]
7-622-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Tirante T.
6-06-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
7-694-67-5
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-23-66-1
R16
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Rubin N.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
4-66-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Folliot Q.
6-46-3
Lama G.
Villanueva G.
2-66-46-4
Cerundolo F.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Mena F.[6]
Rodriguez C.
6-26-4
Dellien H.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-06-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-37-65
Olivo R.
Mena F.[8]
6-36-1
Tirante T.
Furness E.
7-646-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Diez S.
6-16-2
Varillas J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jarry N.[4]
6-43-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Lama G.
6-37-61
Dellien H.[1]
Jubb P.
6-12-0
R32
Rodriguez C.
Burruchaga R.
W/O
Villanueva G.
Martin A.[2]
6-26-3
Franco Descotte M.
Hernandez F.
6-06-0
Alvarez N.
Hidalgo D.
4-67-656-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.[8]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Reyes Varela M.
6-46-2
Sakamoto P.
Olivo R.[5]
6-16-1
Kirchheimer S.
Becerra Otarola I.
6-26-0
Cerundolo F.[4]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-56-3
Dellien H.[1]
Castro C.
6-06-1
Lama G.
Vernier M.
6-26-2
Mena F.[6]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-34-66-4
Galan D.[3]
Merino A.
6-06-1
Rubin N.
Nunez V.
6-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Achondo G.
6-06-0
Dellien H.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-16-0
Tirante T.
Nunez D.
7-656-3
Varillas J.[2]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-624-66-3
Lama G.
Bueno G.
6-46-4
Diez S.
Torres J.
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Juarez F.
3-67-56-3
Jarry N.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Furness E.
Kopriva V.[6]
6-26-1
Jubb P.
Olivieri G.
7-56-3
Olivo R.
De Jong J.
1-67-606-2
Denolly C.
Oliveira G.
6-06-2
Etcheverry T.[3]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-15-76-2
Collarini A.
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Melzer G.
3-66-37-5
Mena F.[8]
Casanova H.
6-10-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Cachin P.
6-33-1