Chun Hsin Tseng vs Mathias Bourgue — Roseto Degli Abruzzi 2 CH Round of 32

Roseto Degli Abruzzi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE8
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
clay
FRA
Mathias Bourgue
#2057ATP
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Tseng C.
7-6 7-6
Bourgue M.
Tseng C.
77772
Bourgue M.
62640

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Mathias Bourgue 7-6 7-6 in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi 2 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bourgue M.

Bourgue M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Bourgue M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 140). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Bourgue M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
38
Break points saved·Even
83
81
Break points won·Clear edge
15
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
73
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
23
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bourgue M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.3
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Guinard M.
Tseng C.[8]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Guinard M.
Giannessi A.
7-56-1
Tseng C.[8]
Skatov T.
7-52-67-66
Quarter-finals
Guinard M.
Kovalik J.
6-16-3
Tseng C.[8]
Taberner C.[3]
6-46-4
Skatov T.
Serdarusic N.
6-47-65
Giannessi A.
Piros Z.
6-27-5
R16
Giannessi A.
Pellegrino A.
6-46-2
Kovalik J.
Haase R.
6-46-2
Guinard M.
Gautier A.
6-16-0
Tseng C.[8]
Agamenone F.
6-46-4
Taberner C.[3]
Gimeno Valero C.
7-636-3
Skatov T.
Elias G.
6-20-67-5
Piros Z.
Vavassori A.
5-76-46-0
Serdarusic N.
Cobolli F.
6-36-757-5
R32
Tseng C.[8]
Bourgue M.
7-627-64
Pellegrino A.
Mager G.[2]
6-46-3
Giannessi A.
Alvarez Varona N.
3-66-16-3
Piros Z.
Martin A.[7]
4-66-37-5
Haase R.
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Guinard M.
Milojevic N.[6]
6-37-5
Agamenone F.
Giustino L.
5-77-56-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Coppejans K.
7-56-747-5
Taberner C.[3]
Zeppieri G.
6-46-2
Skatov T.
Del Federico A.
6-36-1
Cobolli F.
Gaio F.
6-36-4
Vavassori A.
Darderi L.
7-646-1
Kovalik J.
Borges N.
6-16-746-4
Serdarusic N.
Vesely J.[1]
6-26-2
Gautier A.
Schnur B.
4-66-26-3
Elias G.
Zapata Miralles B.[5]
6-32-0