Richard Gasquet vs Facundo Bagnis — Phoenix CH Round of 16

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA
Richard Gasquet
40 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
hard
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1513Hard ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Gasquet R.
6-2 6-0
Bagnis F.
Gasquet R.
662
Bagnis F.
200

Richard Gasquet defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-2 6-0 in the Phoenix CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gasquet R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gasquet R.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gasquet R.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.8
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gasquet R.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
75
54
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
92
Break points won·Clear edge
49
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gasquet R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bagnis F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.
Altmaier D.
2-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.
Broady L.
7-657-5
Kudla D.
Wolf J.
6-736-47-63
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Verdasco F.
7-56-4
Kudla D.
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Broady L.
Goffin D.[8]
2-66-37-5
Altmaier D.
Albot R.
6-47-5
R16
Kudla D.
Moraing M.
7-627-65
Wolf J.
Musetti L.[2]
6-36-2
Gasquet R.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Altmaier D.
Ruusuvuori E.[7]
6-27-5
Albot R.
Paire B.[1]
6-24-67-5
Broady L.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-36-2
Verdasco F.
Majchrzak K.
2-66-47-65
Goffin D.[8]
Eubanks C.
7-623-66-4
R32
Kudla D.
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Bagnis F.
Baez S.[5]
2-66-36-4
Goffin D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
1-66-36-3
Eubanks C.
Simon G.
6-47-5
Altmaier D.
Vukic A.
6-13-66-4
Albot R.
Otte O.
4-66-46-3
Paire B.[1]
Nava E.
7-56-2
Moraing M.
Struff J.[4]
3-67-626-4
Gasquet R.
Kukushkin M.
6-756-16-1
Verdasco F.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-756-3
Ruusuvuori E.[7]
Nakashima B.
6-36-3
Rinderknech A.[3]
Cerundolo F.
1-66-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Gaston H.[6]
6-736-46-4
Broady L.
Cerundolo J.
6-16-2
Musetti L.[2]
Popyrin A.
6-26-2
Wolf J.
Purcell M.
6-16-3