Radu Albot vs Benoit Paire — Phoenix CH Round of 16

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Radu Albot
MDA
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1429Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2022
hard
FRA1
Benoit Paire
#1096ATP
1362ELO
1336Hard ELO
37 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Albot R.
6-2 4-6 7-5
Paire B.
Albot R.
6472
Paire B.
2651

Radu Albot defeated Benoit Paire 6-2 4-6 7-5 in the Phoenix CH round of 16 on hard. Radu Albot narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Radu Albot closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 7–5.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-05-13Rome MastersR64clayRadu Albot6-3 6-2
2017-04-10MarrakechR16clayBenoit Paire6-2 6-2
2016-05-23Roland GarrosR128clayBenoit Paire6-2 4-6 6-4 1-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Albot R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Paire B.

Paire B.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Serve advantage — Albot R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Albot R.Paire B.
1st serve in·Clear edge
65%
52%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
43%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
6.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.9
6.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 192). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Albot R.Paire B.
Clutch Rating·Even
46
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
90
Break points won·Clear edge
19
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Albot R.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Paire B.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+93 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1336
6.0Overall Elo 1453
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1362
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
2.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Albot R.Paire B.
Freshness·
93
—

Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.
Altmaier D.
2-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.
Broady L.
7-657-5
Kudla D.
Wolf J.
6-736-47-63
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Verdasco F.
7-56-4
Kudla D.
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Broady L.
Goffin D.[8]
2-66-37-5
Altmaier D.
Albot R.
6-47-5
R16
Kudla D.
Moraing M.
7-627-65
Wolf J.
Musetti L.[2]
6-36-2
Gasquet R.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Altmaier D.
Ruusuvuori E.[7]
6-27-5
Albot R.
Paire B.[1]
6-24-67-5
Broady L.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-36-2
Verdasco F.
Majchrzak K.
2-66-47-65
Goffin D.[8]
Eubanks C.
7-623-66-4
R32
Kudla D.
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Bagnis F.
Baez S.[5]
2-66-36-4
Goffin D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
1-66-36-3
Eubanks C.
Simon G.
6-47-5
Altmaier D.
Vukic A.
6-13-66-4
Albot R.
Otte O.
4-66-46-3
Paire B.[1]
Nava E.
7-56-2
Moraing M.
Struff J.[4]
3-67-626-4
Gasquet R.
Kukushkin M.
6-756-16-1
Verdasco F.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-756-3
Ruusuvuori E.[7]
Nakashima B.
6-36-3
Rinderknech A.[3]
Cerundolo F.
1-66-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Gaston H.[6]
6-736-46-4
Broady L.
Cerundolo J.
6-16-2
Musetti L.[2]
Popyrin A.
6-26-2
Wolf J.
Purcell M.
6-16-3