Bernard Tomic vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Monterrey CH Round of 32

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
hard
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER4
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Tomic B.
6-2 6-2
Stebe C.
Tomic B.
662
Stebe C.
220

Bernard Tomic defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 6-2 6-2 in the Monterrey CH round of 32 on hard. Bernard Tomic extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-17Delray BeachR32hardCedrik Marcel Stebe6-2 3-6 6-2
2012-09-14Davis Cup WG PO: GER vs AUSRRclayBernard Tomic2-6 6-3 6-4 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Even
53
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
75
Break points won·Slight edge
4
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
86
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Stebe C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
5.7+82 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1556
0.0
H2H
10.0
2.2
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Stebe C.
Freshness·
84
—

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Verdasco F.[1]
Gunneswaran P.[7]
4-66-37-63
Semi-finals
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Soeda G.
6-777-646-4
Verdasco F.[1]
Harrison C.
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Harrison C.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Jung J.[3]
1-67-56-4
Soeda G.
Blanch U.
4-67-656-4
Verdasco F.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
R16
Jung J.[3]
Zhu E.
6-27-5
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Rybakov A.
7-616-1
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Robredo T.
6-36-1
Soeda G.
Ficovich J.[5]
2-66-26-2
Harrison C.
Tomic B.
6-27-5
Mmoh M.
Hijikata R.
6-756-16-4
Blanch U.
Clarke J.[2]
7-646-2
Verdasco F.[1]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
R32
Harrison C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-37-5
Ficovich J.[5]
Krstin P.
6-27-5
Jung J.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-1
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Harrison R.
6-36-4
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-22-66-4
Mmoh M.
Janvier M.[6]
6-46-4
Hijikata R.
Blumberg W.
2-66-36-0
Kovacevic A.
Nakagawa N.
6-26-2
Verdasco F.[1]
Li Z.
6-46-2
Blanch U.
Lenz J.
6-34-66-2
Rybakov A.
Statham J.
7-56-3
Soeda G.
Durasovic V.
6-26-706-3
Clarke J.[2]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Robredo T.
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Zhu E.
Cossu M.
6-16-2
Tomic B.
Stebe C.[4]
6-26-2