Tennys Sandgren vs John Millman — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 2

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
hard
AUS1
John Millman
37 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
Sandgren T.
6-7 7-6 7-6
Millman J.
Sandgren T.
63710772
Millman J.
7768651

Tennys Sandgren defeated John Millman 6-7 7-6 7-6 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — John Millman came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Tennys Sandgren claimed a first win over John Millman in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-12-31BrisbaneR32hardJohn Millman7-6(6) 6-7(6) 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Millman J.

Millman J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Millman J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (118 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Millman J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
70
Break points saved·Even
92
95
Break points won·Dominant
2
64
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Millman J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.5
Country comfort
5.2
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 10%
Q2
Daniel T.[12]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Rune H.[3]
Kozlov S.[15]
6-46-2
Wolf J.
Galan D.[11]
7-636-2
Broady L.[17]
Oconnell C.
7-676-0
Kukushkin M.
Nishioka Y.[6]
6-27-64
Eubanks C.
Sousa J.[2]
7-647-64
Kohlschreiber P.[22]
Kudla D.[10]
0-66-36-3
Munar J.[8]
Vukic A.[18]
6-36-2
Sandgren T.
Millman J.[1]
6-737-687-65
Shang J.
Moraing M.[19]
6-30-0
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Pospisil V.[20]
7-657-5
Machac T.
Marchenko I.
5-76-36-3
Q1
Nishioka Y.[6]
Grenier H.
6-13-66-4
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-4
Vukic A.[18]
Caruso S.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.
Fratangelo B.[24]
4-66-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Seppi A.[16]
6-26-4
Millman J.[1]
Holt B.
6-46-0
Munar J.[8]
Kuzuhara B.
6-16-4
Shang J.
Cerundolo F.[9]
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[20]
Gerasimov E.
4-66-46-4
Oconnell C.
Anderson K.[4]
3-66-26-2
Eubanks C.
Lopez F.[13]
4-66-37-5
Sousa J.[2]
Purcell M.
5-77-657-64
Kohlschreiber P.[22]
Bolt A.
2-66-46-4
Broady L.[17]
Ramanathan R.
6-23-66-4
Rune H.[3]
Krueger M.
6-43-66-3
Daniel T.[12]
Nava E.
7-57-5
Kudla D.[10]
Tseng C.
6-16-4
Galan D.[11]
Popko D.
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Gomez E.[23]
6-16-3
Masur D.
Ymer E.[21]
6-47-5
Kozlov S.[15]
Sec S.
6-36-746-2
Machac T.
Albot R.[14]
6-47-5
Moraing M.[19]
Maden Y.
5-4
Marchenko I.
Cecchinato M.[5]
6-16-2