Fernando Verdasco vs Zhe Li — Monterrey CH Round of 32

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP1
Fernando Verdasco
42 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
hard
CHN
Zhe Li
#1964ATP
39 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWW
Verdasco F.
6-4 6-2
Li Z.
Verdasco F.
662
Li Z.
420

Fernando Verdasco defeated Zhe Li 6-4 6-2 in the Monterrey CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Fernando Verdasco came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Fernando Verdasco extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-10-09Shanghai MastersR64hardFernando Verdasco6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Verdasco F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Li Z.

Li Z.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Verdasco F.

Serve advantage — Li Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Verdasco F.Li Z.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Verdasco F.Li Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
23
Break points saved·Dominant
96
58
Break points won·Clear edge
40
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
65
44
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Verdasco F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Li Z.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 414 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Verdasco F.[1]
Gunneswaran P.[7]
4-66-37-63
Semi-finals
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Soeda G.
6-777-646-4
Verdasco F.[1]
Harrison C.
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Harrison C.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Jung J.[3]
1-67-56-4
Soeda G.
Blanch U.
4-67-656-4
Verdasco F.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
R16
Jung J.[3]
Zhu E.
6-27-5
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Rybakov A.
7-616-1
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Robredo T.
6-36-1
Soeda G.
Ficovich J.[5]
2-66-26-2
Harrison C.
Tomic B.
6-27-5
Mmoh M.
Hijikata R.
6-756-16-4
Blanch U.
Clarke J.[2]
7-646-2
Verdasco F.[1]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
R32
Harrison C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-37-5
Ficovich J.[5]
Krstin P.
6-27-5
Jung J.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-1
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Harrison R.
6-36-4
Blancaneaux G.[8]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-22-66-4
Mmoh M.
Janvier M.[6]
6-46-4
Hijikata R.
Blumberg W.
2-66-36-0
Kovacevic A.
Nakagawa N.
6-26-2
Verdasco F.[1]
Li Z.
6-46-2
Blanch U.
Lenz J.
6-34-66-2
Rybakov A.
Statham J.
7-56-3
Soeda G.
Durasovic V.
6-26-706-3
Clarke J.[2]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Robredo T.
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Zhu E.
Cossu M.
6-16-2
Tomic B.
Stebe C.[4]
6-26-2