Gonzalo Lama vs Facundo Juarez — Santiago CH Round of 32

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHI
Gonzalo Lama
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
clay
ITA
Facundo Juarez
#809ATP
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
Lama G.
6-2 6-7 6-1
Juarez F.
Lama G.
66462
Juarez F.
27711

Gonzalo Lama defeated Facundo Juarez 6-2 6-7 6-1 in the Santiago CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Gonzalo Lama came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Gonzalo Lama came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lama G.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Juarez F.

Juarez F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Lama G.

Serve advantage — Juarez F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lama G.Juarez F.
1st serve in·Clear edge
60%
74%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
0.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lama G.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Juarez F.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
4.6
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[3]
Tabilo A.[2]
6-34-66-4
Semi-finals
Dellien H.[3]
Etcheverry T.[5]
6-36-736-4
Tabilo A.[2]
Varillas J.[4]
7-666-1
Quarter-finals
Tabilo A.[2]
Kopriva V.
6-24-66-3
Varillas J.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
7-56-2
Dellien H.[3]
De Jong J.
6-36-3
Etcheverry T.[5]
Lehecka J.[1]
6-46-3
R16
Kopriva V.
Kicker N.
6-44-67-5
Dellien H.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Etcheverry T.[5]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-14-67-5
Tabilo A.[2]
Lama G.
6-16-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Londero J.[6]
6-756-27-5
Lehecka J.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-33-66-3
Varillas J.[4]
Torres J.
6-16-3
De Jong J.
Jubb P.
7-56-3
R32
Tabilo A.[2]
Nunez D.
7-56-0
Lama G.
Juarez F.
6-26-746-1
Kicker N.
Mena F.
6-36-4
Kopriva V.
Jarry N.[7]
1-67-636-3
Torres J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Olivieri G.
6-33-66-3
Londero J.[6]
Collarini A.
6-07-65
Jubb P.
Casanova H.
6-12-66-2
Olivo R.
Becerra Otarola I.
6-26-0
Dellien H.[3]
Cachin P.
2-67-646-1
Etcheverry T.[5]
Furness E.
7-56-2
Oliveira G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-26-1
Lehecka J.[1]
Martineau M.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Barrios Vera T.[8]
6-17-60
Ugo Carabelli C.
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Varillas J.[4]
Tirante T.
6-46-3