Juncheng Shang vs Francisco Cerundolo — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
hard
Francisco Cerundolo
ARG9
Francisco Cerundolo
#21ATP
1931ELO
1880Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$11MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
Shang J.
7-6 6-4
Cerundolo F.
Shang J.
7762
Cerundolo F.
6440

Juncheng Shang defeated Francisco Cerundolo 7-6 6-4 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Francisco Cerundolo came in ranked #21.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cerundolo F.

Cerundolo F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Cerundolo F.
34
Serve
13
18
Return
67

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Cerundolo F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Cerundolo F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
88
Break points saved·Even
96
98
Break points won·Dominant
45
86
Deciding sets·Even
94
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cerundolo F.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Hard Elo 1698
Surface ELO
7.1+182 Hard Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1931
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shang J.Cerundolo F.
Freshness·
—
96

Cerundolo F.: 10 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 10%
Q2
Daniel T.[12]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Rune H.[3]
Kozlov S.[15]
6-46-2
Wolf J.
Galan D.[11]
7-636-2
Broady L.[17]
Oconnell C.
7-676-0
Kukushkin M.
Nishioka Y.[6]
6-27-64
Eubanks C.
Sousa J.[2]
7-647-64
Kohlschreiber P.[22]
Kudla D.[10]
0-66-36-3
Munar J.[8]
Vukic A.[18]
6-36-2
Sandgren T.
Millman J.[1]
6-737-687-65
Shang J.
Moraing M.[19]
6-30-0
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Pospisil V.[20]
7-657-5
Machac T.
Marchenko I.
5-76-36-3
Q1
Nishioka Y.[6]
Grenier H.
6-13-66-4
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-4
Vukic A.[18]
Caruso S.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.
Fratangelo B.[24]
4-66-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Seppi A.[16]
6-26-4
Millman J.[1]
Holt B.
6-46-0
Munar J.[8]
Kuzuhara B.
6-16-4
Shang J.
Cerundolo F.[9]
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[20]
Gerasimov E.
4-66-46-4
Oconnell C.
Anderson K.[4]
3-66-26-2
Eubanks C.
Lopez F.[13]
4-66-37-5
Sousa J.[2]
Purcell M.
5-77-657-64
Kohlschreiber P.[22]
Bolt A.
2-66-46-4
Broady L.[17]
Ramanathan R.
6-23-66-4
Rune H.[3]
Krueger M.
6-43-66-3
Daniel T.[12]
Nava E.
7-57-5
Kudla D.[10]
Tseng C.
6-16-4
Galan D.[11]
Popko D.
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Gomez E.[23]
6-16-3
Masur D.
Ymer E.[21]
6-47-5
Kozlov S.[15]
Sec S.
6-36-746-2
Machac T.
Albot R.[14]
6-47-5
Moraing M.[19]
Maden Y.
5-4
Marchenko I.
Cecchinato M.[5]
6-16-2